I quite like “Experiments”.
Since these ideas are so new, it would be great to have a forum for red-teaming proposed implementations, and gaming out different scenarios. As the youtube comments demonstrate, there will be feedback and misunderstanding. Having a place to anticipate and get ahead of that could prove useful.
Also would like to propose two new sections:
Reading articles and listening to a few of Glen’s presentations, there were a couple of words I had to look up and others I just didn’t understand. The article: “Why I’m not a Capitalist” for example, doesn’t define “Capitalist” in the context of the article, or the properties of the term which he sees as most problematic.
Also, the definitions of words being used in presentations are often overloaded. In everyday discourse for example, people often use Capitalism and Corporatism or Socialism and Communism interchangeably.
If we want to reach a broad audience, a central repository of ubiquitous intuitive terms we can use to help communicate with each other, and with a broader audience might be beneficial, specially for communicating with people outside the community not versed in econ and philosophy.
As RxC ideas spread, we’re going to get feedback.
Having a centralized place where we can understand how people are reacting, and collaborate on how best to address their concerns can both promote the development of successful policies, and increase the likelihood of their ultimate acceptance.
At the end of the day, if we want to make a broad, positive impact, we’re going to need compelling, evidence based talking points with a good dose of WIFM.